On page 123, Strichartz makes the claim that it is simple to see the equivalence between two somewhat vaguely worded statements. The equivalence is essentially true, and while it is simple in one direction, does not appear to be simple in the other. It seems a mistake to claim it was simple, but worse still, the direction in which it seems non-obvious has very little importance and only serves as a major distraction to the reader.
The important direction is that the Lipschitz condition implies uniform continuity and this was shown in class and is included here as Fact 1.
Fact 1 Suppose that
and there exists a constant M
such that for all x,x0, it follows that
Then for all 1/m we can say that if
then
|f(x)-f(x0)| < 1/m. Hence f is uniformly continuous.
Proof Suppose the
assertion is true. Let 1/m be given and
suppose
then
Note that in proving uniform continuity,
it is not always the case that 1/n is a constant multiple
of 1/m. A simple example where 1/n=1/m2 is shown in Fact 2.
Fact 2 Let
Then f is uniformly continuous
on
Proof Let 1/m be given. Pick
Suppose
and
There are two cases. In case 1, if
and
then
It turns out that if the statements are formalized properly, the reverse direction of the equivalence claim made by Strichartz is in fact true, but due to the fact that 1/m cannot be made large for positive integers m, it is more difficult to show. As mentioned earlier, it is of little importance, but for completeness, the formal statement and the proof is included below.
Fact 3 Suppose that
and
that there exists a positive integer M such that
for all 1/m we can say that if
then
|f(y)-f(y0)| < 1/m. Then
for all
Proof Suppose the hypothesis holds for a positive integer M.
Let
be given. For all positive integers
m there exists a positive integer N such that