John B. Brunski, Ph.D.

  Professor, Biomedical Engineering

   

Research Area

In Vivo Studies of Interfacial Overload

Based on a number of studies in animal models and humans with symptoms of overload -- such as screw loosening, implant fracture, crestal bone loss, etc. -- the hypothesis described below has evolved to explain what is happening. 
Very large local strains -- in excess of the yield point of bone -- may be occurring at the micro-level, which causes microdamage, abbreviated MDx.  In turn, this MDx triggers bone remodeling in an effort to repair the local damage.  However, the potential problem with this  self-repair effort is that the remodeling proceeds by the steps of A-R-F, Activation of osteoclasts, Resorption of a packet of bone, and then Formation (refilling) of the resorbed region.  While R is going on (and R is normally much faster than F), holes (resorption tunnels excavated by osteoclasts) develop in the bone.  This can be seen in the FE simulation above.  If loading continues while these holes exist, the local strains can worsen, especially near the holes, thereby causing more microdamage, more A-R-F, and so on.  If this process continues unabated, it could eventually lead to interface failure (and failure of the entire implant case) if the damage accumulation rate exceeds the repair rate.  To avoid such a process, the goal is to design the implant loading, implant geometry, bone contact, etc., so that interfacial strains never exceed the damage limits during use of the implant.  However, until we nail down the exact mechanism underlying the above hypothesized events, we will not be in a position to do this in a reliable way.

References for the photos above:

top left: Prabhu A and Brunski JB (1997) "An overload failure of a dental prosthesis: a 3D finite element nonlinear contact analysis. In: 1997 Bioengineering Conference BED Vol 36 B. Simon (ed).  NY: ASME, pp. 141-142.
bottom left: Brunski JB and Yang C-J (1998) "Finite element simulation of damage-induced bone remodeling at a bone-implant interface" Trans 44th Orthop Res Soc, p. 341.
top right & bottom right: Hoshaw SJ, Watson JT, Schaffler MB, Fyhrie DP (1995) "Microdamage at bone-implant interfaces affects bone remodeling activity."  Trans 41st Orthop Res Soc, p. 188.•
 
 
 
 

 

Welcome · Biographical Sketch · Research · Publications · Educational Initiatives · Downloads · Contact · Biomedical Engineering Home Page